He may or may not be a scoundrel, I guarantee there will be people try to tear him down whatever the case is about him, but the real question is more about if the links he is providing he is representing the results of the studies correctly or at least is his interpretation appropriate. Are the links he gives to back up his assertions appropriate and say what he says they say? There are an awful lot of links and I and I expect you will neither of us have the time to study them all.

The plant based gurus are all the time tearing down the doctors and researchers I listen to. I have listened to some of them. Meh. There is room for some interpretation differences but I mostly just find if the presentation is an hour long 55 minutes will be personal attacks and innuendos with a few minutes of opinions that might have some merit. Lets just say I am usually not impressed.

At least that article gives the references, a multitude of them, so a person can decide for themselves if there is merit to his assertations. Got to give him credit for that. Some of the plant based links I have followed for their "proof" have been less than impressive.